Yes, I think, too, that there is no other way.
Bahá'u'lláh (1817-1892) proposed a world treaty, of the following form: if one country should attack another, all others should rise together, to reduce the aggressor. With or without treaty, it seems to me this is exactly the direction humanity is heading. And this is the way it should be.
>Hi folks,
>
>In light of the recent discussions here about how best to respond to the recent attack on the WTC and what the best response should be I'd like to offer this link to an article written by a Michael Kelly.
>
>For the record, I agree with his assessment.
>
>
http://jewishworldreview.com/michael/kelly.html
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
