Good question.
I'd call it a bug, but it may be a result of tightening up the DBC as new features like database events were added to the language.
If any one knows the correct answer to this question, let me know.
>Is this a bug, or a planned/documented change in functionality?
>
>
>>My biggest problem with 7.0 is you can no longer create "temporary" indexes of tables in a read only DBC. (read non-structural, i.e. INDEX ON
TO TEMP.IDX). This worked fine in 6.0 but doesn't in 7.0. My solution: free tables. Not the solution I would have sought, but workable.
>>
Timothy D. Yeaney
MCSD, Charter Member
President, PAFOX (Potomac Area Fox User Group)
mailto:
tim@eagleeyeinc.com Vice President
Eagle Eye Publishers, Inc
Broaden Your Vision, Sharpen Your Focus
