Thanks, Bill!

That's the kind of reference I wanted. We think the product is quite impressive, given its cost. Now I know it keeps performing well under big sets, which was our main concern.

I'll put my order now.

Thanks again.


>We have been using XCase since the early versions and we just got XCase 6.0. Ellie Muyal demonstrated the features personally at Dev Con. I got my copy and completely reverse engineered a SQL database with over 150 tables and 120 Stored procedures. Since it did such a good job of reverse engineering, I assume it will do the right job of maintaining and updating your database. The tech support is very good, Ellie is almost always reachable by email with quick turnaround and they appear to be committed to staying abreast of all new technologies in DB maintenance. I recommend it.
>
>Bill
>
>>Hello, all.
>>
>>I've being evaluating xCase to manage our SQL Server DBs, and it seems preety good. However, we did all our tests with the free Lite version, which just allows for 5 tables.
>>
>>Anyone using it with large table sets? Our main product DB has above 300 tables, with lots of relations. xCase has a good feature that allows to build different sets from a documentation and reviewing perspective, where a table can be in various sets, so we think we can manage all this well.
>>
>>The question is if someone has any bad experience with the product, or some good advice before we spend the $800 for the first full license.
>>
>>Thank in advance,