>I would be really impressed if anything ran in 128
KB these days, much >less 32
KB. I think you mean MB, and the recommended minimum is 64MB.
OK, so I'm dyslexic and can't tell the differenct between K's and M's. :-)
>>32 KB
Well, how about an embedded controller running in machine language?
I checked, my NT 4.0 server is running on 64MB. I'm happy with 256MB on my Win2000 Pro desktop and Win 98 laptop.
Personally, I think it would be an great if Microsoft would offer something called XP-Basic would provide *just* the OS, and network connectivity. Maybe something that would really run in 64MB. Charge $79.00 for it.
Think of the advertising possibilities:
"XP-Basic. A computer operating system, not a way of life."
Best wishes,
-- Larry Keyes
Remember only You can prevent Gray Goo. Never release nanobot assembers without replication limiting code.
