>The ability to support all browsers would require to drop about 40% of all of our features assuming we would want to do them in the same timeframe. I guess some sites that do support most of them are either using that approach or have the infrastructure to manage that.
>
>Yes, I know some sites would work ok, some won't. This is just how the Internet is. It depends also on what the site has to deliver as per the content and how the users want it.
Michel,
Despite my use of the word "protest", I would definitely NOT want to lose some of the features of the UT that look non-standard to me (and that don't work in Opera), especially the buttons at the top, that refresh automatically. I would rather continue using IE!
Apart from the incompatibilities with "other" browsers, the UT works better than most discussion groups, whether they be based on HTTP or on NNTP.
Hilmar.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
