Also the article is talking about VFP 7
What I was trying to point out is that the article is trying to put VFP7 as a client-server development tool and this for me is a shoot in the foot of VFP.
My main development is COM+ application I personly dont like to do windows forms so much litle things that we have to consider the grid that dosn't behave like we espected etc... I prefer to do business objects where I don't have to mind with all these minor stuff.

>>Then read the article and then whe will talk.
>>
>>>-snip-
>>>>I'm saying that since the person that have written this article Jenny Brown as a statement that I pass to quote "What's VFP's role in this changing development world?
>>>>While .NET is geared primarily for distributed, Web-based applications, VFP will continue to be geared toward robust client-server applications."
>>>-snip-
>>>
>>>While I haven't read the complete article (to see its context), it is kind of an oversight, given that when VFP6 came out it was positioned as a tool for middle-tier components on an n-tier system. Let's not even talk about VFP7 and web services.
>
>Just FYI, I was agreeing with you. sheesh..