> In regards to MIchel's posting of VFP vs Access messages... I hope this is something that can be passed along for reference.. I can NOT claim authorship, but I can claim to have been part of this thread up on the MS newsgroups..

Thanks Tony.

I am sure this will be of good use to anyone who might need it.

>Myth 3: VFP is slower than Visual Basic

In addition: They put Rushmore in Access and VB is using Access for data handling, so back to Rushmore. If they put Rushmore in all those products, than I guess this is because it is fast and offer more power.

>Myth 4: Microsoft does not support VFP.

In addition: If Microsoft would stop to support VFP, they wouldn't have continued to do DevCons, worked on Visual FoxPro 6, already started to work on Visual FoxPro 7, supported the MS MVP on this forum, continued to advertise, etc.