>>I've considered all this and come to the same conclusion. Well, I wasn't
>>advocating OKL at all - the original subject of this thread was 'how to
>>call a method via OKL' (I presumed the person who asked the question
>>knew why he does it), but we surely came down to 'why' and 'why not'
>>very soon. OKL does sound nice in theory, but in practice should be
>>avoided at safe distance.
>Dragan,
>
>I think the point is more that OKL's should be udnerstood for what they are and are not and that they should be used where an intercommand interrupt is required and not where that behavior would cause or could cause problems.

Good point, Jim. Thanks for saying it so clear!

Vlad