>That's what my point was. VFP should find a niche where it's better at some things than .Net is just like it's better at a lot of things than VB is. This was all in response to a comment that said VFP will continue to be a good tool for desktop development while .Net will take over for web development. I don't agree with that, since like you said, .NET will be able to compete with VFP at every level and VFP, IMHO, will probably be able to do a lot of things as good as or better with web apps...

Well for one thing we can do things *way* faster with VFP than any of the .Net languages. It'll take a fraction of the code to do things in VFP than it does in any .Net language...

That alone ought give people thought - less code = bugs!

+++ Rick ---