I only said that VFP 8 is neccessarily part of VFP's future. Any statement about VFP's future must include 8. Certainly, VFP's future may very well encompass more than 8. Still, 8 lies on the critical path.

Where is the distortion?

< JVP >




>>If that does not say the future of VFP, which is 8, depends on sales/upgrades to 7, I don't know what does.
>
>Its nice that you warp the statement "future of VFP" to mean VFP8 explicitly in order to prove your point. Stop distoring facts, John.