Mike,
>>I only said that VFP 8 is neccessarily part of VFP's future. Any statement about VFP's future must include 8. Certainly, VFP's future may very well encompass more than 8. Still, 8 lies on the critical path.
>
>I'm not disagreeing that 8 is apart of the VFP's future.
>
>Ken said: The Fox team is and will be measured by the number of developers who upgrade to VFP 7.0 or MSDN subscriptions, that is what determines the future of VFP more than anything else.
>
>You said: Put another way, not enough people are upgrading to warrant making VFP 8 a slam-dunk that it will release.
>
>They do not mean the same thing, and you're trying to make them. Stop spreading FUD.
What John said made sense to me. I don't suppose that
that proves anything.....
<g>
But it does make sense. I see what John was saying as a simple projection of a thought into the future.
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
