Information générale
Catégorie:
Conférences & événements
>According Webster.com – to badger is “to harass or annoy persistently”.
If that is so, then it is up to Ken to draw that conclusion, not you or anybody else. Of course, if I annoy you, simply add me to your twit filter, ignore me, and move on...
This whole episode shows once again, what an unlevel playing field it is. Mind you, I am not complaining or crying over it. Rather, I recognize the reality for what it is...
>I'm no lawyer, but I guess the question then becomes "Which point of view determines the existence of badgering - the view of the 'badgerer' or the view of the 'badgeree' ... "
>
As I said, since the discussion was between me and Ken, it is up to Ken to make that determination. Of course, you are entitled to your opinions and comments. Unlike many here, I believe in equal protection as far as that issue is concerned.
Unfairly, I am being viewed as more of an iconoclast as opposed to simply being a member of the community that made a suggestion...
< JVP >
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement