John,

I learned my lesson a year or so ago not to attempt to engage in a lenghty debate with you.

My point was that, for everyone here, it is imporant to realize that while we may not intend to respond to posts in a manner that results in the other person taking the comments 'personally' - if that is the effect - then the comments were indeed personal.

In other words if I say to Joe Blow, "You don't know what you're talking about..." - when in fact he does not know what he is talking about - this would be a statement of fact - it would also a statement which would be taken personally by poor old Joe.

I think alot of us, myself included, seem to forget this when we respond to posts occasionally here.

And I think we should all attempt to read the the words we type from the other person's point of view before hitting the 'send' button.

That was the point I was attempting to make. I'll let you have the last word.

AKW

>
>If that is so, then it is up to Ken to draw that conclusion, not you or anybody else. Of course, if I annoy you, simply add me to your twit filter, ignore me, and move on...
>
>This whole episode shows once again, what an unlevel playing field it is. Mind you, I am not complaining or crying over it. Rather, I recognize the reality for what it is...
>
>
>As I said, since the discussion was between me and Ken, it is up to Ken to make that determination. Of course, you are entitled to your opinions and comments. Unlike many here, I believe in equal protection as far as that issue is concerned.
>
>< JVP >