>>>Michel-
>>>
>>>>>I just wrote up a FAQ, hit submit, and got no confirmation it was accepted, and a message about how the summary should be at least 250 characters. Was there a problem posting?
>>>>
>>>>Yes, since a few months, we require a good summary. This helps people a lot when searching and browsing those lists. So, it is appreciated when people take the time to do so. :)
>>>
>>>That is really frustrating. There was no warning about a minimum length. My summary was sufficient even if it wasn't 250 characters, it was not clear that the post wasn't made, and the back key took my to a blank page so I couldn't recover my text. (Not to mention there is no easy way to tell my summary _is_ 250 characters without using word or some other tool with char count. Of course I _will_ do this in future so I don't lose my efforts.)
>>
>>It is sad that you got frustrated.
>>
>>As for that section, it is also subject to enhancements and validation will occur with prefilled values entered by the members.
>
>BTW, is it possible to expand AutoLink feature on FAQ and other sections? I believe, I made this wish long time ago in UT suggestions document. In my FAQs I usually reference Thread number, sometimes MS KB and it would be great to have AutoLink feature working here...

Yes, of course. Is that wish still in the list?