Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
The history of FoxPro
Message
De
23/10/2001 10:39:31
 
 
À
22/10/2001 18:02:23
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00568966
Message ID:
00572051
Vues:
28
First Andrew is a member (#27965), so maybe you can get the details from him. The way I remember it, he was among the first to discover the Divide by Zero problem and because he needed an immediate fix and had the talent, he figured out where the problem was, and created both a .PRG and later an .EXE that patched the FPW files. His solution is unique in that it will fix any version of FPW 2.5 or 2.6 (and a number of other programs that used the same technology that caused the "real" problem). Shortly before MS released the "official" FPW 2.6a only patcher, they requested that Andrew withdraw his technically illegal version from circulation - and he did! If you do a search on DZPATCH, you can still find a number of places that still offer it, because its the only solution for code that simply can't be upgraded to FPW 2.6a. Some have suggested that without Andrew's "push" by publishing this code, MS may have never provided a fix (or at least waited a lot longer) - after all they really wanted you to upgrade to VFP 5.0!

Rick

>Thanks Rick!
>
>>According to my information Andrew Forber released the DZPATCH.PRG (internally FixFox.PRG), on 8/20/98, and the .EXE version came out on 10/29/98. It's interesting to note, that when you compare a "fixed" .EXE or .ESL with this program and also the official MS variant, the image is identical.
>
>At the timeline (http://www.black-beans.com.br/foxprohistory/timelinefromthefox.htm) you can read: "1999 (December) Microsoft releases FoxPro patch for fast PCs (file that updates the FoxPro for Windows version 2.6a..."
>
>What you're telling me is: before that "Andrew Forber released the DZPATCH.PRG (internally FixFox.PRG), on 8/20/98, and the .EXE version came out on 10/29/98." with the same purpose?
>
>Also, pardom my ignorance, but who is Andrew Forber?
>
>Fernando
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform