I do differentiate between SP's and SPT.

Interesting, on one hand, you say don't disrupt and obfuscate, and that you want to engage in professional argument. Then, you immediately take a swipe at me regarding law school and the insinuation of not being productive.

Perhaps you should take some of your own advice here John...



>Dear John
>
>If we cannot distinguish SP from SPT because SP is called using SPT, I'm afraid this is not the sort of discussion I have time for. Professional argument requires that intended and obvious meaning be pursued rather than dredging for possibilities to disrupt or obfuscate.
>
>As for the rest, you continue to paraphrase and translate imaginatively as an argument style. I'm not one of your law student friends, can we be a bit more productive?
>
>Regards
>
>JR