Dear John

>>Basically, you are saying my point is not technically sustainable because you say it is not sustainable. <<

I recommend you look up how scientific method works. Because you have taken an absolute position, if I can cite a single example where your position is wrong, your argument is disproven. QED. You can quote as many supporting examples as you like without "proving" anything. Such is the joy and hurt of an absolute position.

If the wiki is as deficient as you say, you could always fix it. This is not a "challenge" or attack, merely an observation.

As for "coming after" you; my concern is that scoffing and belittling commentary causes some people to shy away and we never get to hear their experience. Even if people are "wrong" it is good to hear and discuss their viewpoints. We all learn. I will always pipe up if I see scoffing and belittling slogans in a technical discussion.

An example quoted elsewhere about RVs against the AS400, for example, is something I had not seen here before but it is an example where SP is out of the question. We all have a responsibility to ensure that our actions do not make participation so unpleasant that it is easier to shut up than to share important experience like this.

So cut the scoffing and belittling slogans. The ball is in your court.

Regards

JR