I think you're not very 'smart' at taking the 'deleted field' for explaining a RV weakness, because if you're a very good developer you won't have to delete fields or change fieldnames because tables have been the result of an exhaustive analysis, if not, you're not being 'professional'. Do you think so? ITOH I use RV for all 'updateable data' and SPT for reports and queries.

Thanks for reading me

Luis



>>I must say I am amazed at some of the examples you post. The most recent example about RV and the changed field name? Change "RV" to "SP" in your point and it is JUST AS LIKELY to apply. What sort of argument is that?
>>
>
>It is a simple example, yet addresses one of the most glaring limitations of RV's.
>