>>>>Is there a reason that you are not using "INSERT INTO tablename ..." to add records?
>>>
>>>Hi Larry, have not heard from you in a while...
>>>I am using APPEND BLANK with table buffering, is it preferably to use INSERT INTO with table buffering?
>>>:)))))
>>
>>insert into is preferrable almost all the time
>
>especially assuming multiple manipulations with buffering, etc.:)
...yeah...what they said! //:^)
Still having problems with the dups. I know that there are bugs using table buffering. I dont recall specifically what they are, but nevertheless I dont like table buffering because it consumes a lot of network and work station resources (from what I understand). Unless you are adding multiple records (child records) that may need to be "undone" then you should try to stay with record buffering. //:^)