>Hi Larry..
>
>Now I see where implements fits... I have not looked at this since early on. At one time, I thought it worked the same way as VFPCOM did.
>
>Thanks for the clarification...
>
>But you know what, I don't like this behavior - because you have to implement a whole bunch of other things. I know one should implement an entire, not just part of an interface. THe nice thing about VFPCOM is that it was like WITH EVENTS in VB. There are times when all you care about is the events. I see event binding and interface implementation as two different things - that have been munged together...

Hey John,
AFAIK, you have to implement the whole interface even in VB. If you leave out something, the DLL won't compile.

Implements gives VFPers interface binding. The first stage of it is used for Event interface binding. Perhaps we'll get further functionality in future releases.

Regards.