>>Steve;
>>
>>Good idea! Now we know he has access to the table and can update it.
>>
>>Tom
>
>Tom,
>
>Well, I almost suggested doing these tests in a separate program file, but that wouldn't really show where the conflict is (in the form).

Steve and Ken;

I am staying in the background. I do not want to confuse the issue by giving Ken a second set of things to do at the same time you are suggesting things. :)

Tom