>>>So, we think of it as a good thing, we have the right amount of features with acceptable performance that will only be getting better.
>>
>>Mike,
>>
>>It sounds like you're not saying that it's necessarily a good thing that it runs slow, but rather that it's not a bad thing; an acceptable trade-off for what it will be able to do in the future. Why waste time coding for small advantages in speed now - possibly giving up some features - when the speed will likely take care of itself in a year or two with new technology? I never thought of it that way, but it makes sense.
>>
>>Renoir
>
>As I said : "I can understand that slow may not necessarily be a bad thing, but it can never be a good thing."
>
>There's a world of difference between saying that the application running slow is a good thing and saying the the application running slow is not a bad thing.

I think that was my point.

R