>>I've submitted it to Foxcentral.net as well and it is already up there.
>
>This is somethign I've been worrying about for a while now. Why does the UT think that they shoudl forward everything to FoxCentral.net? It seems like, if dotComSolutions wanted something known, THEY should publish it to FC, and if they aren't a provider, you should be encouraging them to become one.
>
>Currently, it looks like the UT is bullying its was to become synomous with FoxCentral. For example, currently the news being shown on the HTML version of the site is ActiveVFP, EPS, and HentzenWerke news, all with the UT logo right beside it. All three of these news items could have been posted by their respectful sources. Seems like an abusive use of FoxCentral, but I'm not sure. Thoughts?

I agree, I will have this changed. Basically we should have a rule that news relating to the provider itself can post a news item. Meaning, if UniversalTrhead.com updated some feature on the UT or something about its business, it can post a news item, but not about another company. This will also encourage 3rd parties to post their own FoxCentral.net news item.