>What is better? Using Table buffering (with indexes and grids) or Transactions (always with indexes and grids) ?
>
>It seems to me that table buffering is not very secure in multiuser environments (records splitting between two different clients (computers on the netwotk)!! et similia...)
>
>Thanks.
>Davide

Davide,
They're 2 different entities, might be used w/o each other or both.
You have complete control over it with the supplied 4 different buffering types, getfldstate(), getnextmodified(), tableupdate(), tablerevert(), oldval(), curval() etc. You can wrap it in a transaction. I think it's more secure than not having it in a multiuser, network or similar.
Cetin