Rick, sorry to ruffle your feathers. Like I said I didn't mean to dimish your product's other capabilities. I only said a file-based mode(semaphore) was the basis for your product, meaning, when you first released it, I believe it was only file-based. Also, at least the last time I looked, the default mode when someone installs is also file-based. For the record, yes, your product does support a COM mode and, yes, you do encourage people to use it for speed and scalability. But, I never said it didn't...
>> have never created ActiveVFP. Finally, although you may be one of the most
knowledgable people on this subject, we have every right to express our opinion here as you do. Why are you afraid of a little competition??
>
>I don't care how you advertise your product. I've never mentioned a word to any other competitor - all's fair when it comes to products. Let them stand on their own merit.
>
>But when you mention my product by name and misrepresent the functionality by either wrong information or inferred inferior operation (file based operation inferring slow), I will not let that stand without a comment...
>
>+++ Rick ---