>Correct. Properties are not supported. Since they imply "state", they don't really make a lot of sense.
>
>BTW, I've been working on a white paper w/samples on using VFP web services with complex types. For example, having your VFP web service return arrays and objects (e.g., ADO Recordsets, VFP objects). Pretty cool stuff using Custom Type Mappers. If a few folks are interested in assisting and reviewing the paper, I would love some feedback before we post this to our web site.

I'm sure they'll be a lot of interest.

But, that's an interesting subject about the properties. It's true at first I thought we would be able to do that also. Do you think at long term, that could be possible? I mean if a Web Service would support a connection state, then it could open the door to various new possibilities.