>
>That's an interesting idea, though all code is already written and tested. Tables are part of DBC. So, can you elaborate more on your suggestion? (Seems like a tremendeous change in the existing algorithm :()
>>
Can you give me an example of the types of table alterations that are allowed? Are people allowed to change the name of a field? Or is it generally adding/deleting a field and changing the widths of fields?
Steve Gibson