>We obviously disagree.

You and I disagree? Nah, never ;-)

>I cite again that full disclosure (at least it sure sounded/looked like it, but how can a user ever know for sure) was the standard at Fox Software.

Like I said, when security and privacy is at risk, its a different story than bugs related to indexes being corrupted or the command window not remembering where it was last.

>The list of problems was miles long yet, despite that (and I maintain BECAUSE of that) people continued to buy FP in droves and droves.

Are you saying that because there were problems with FP and they were pulic knoweldge people bought FP? What premise lead you to that conlusion?

>It should never be considered a problem to be upfront with your customers and potential customers. My opinion is that to use any excuse to do otherwise is simply a cop-out, likely covering up other deficiencies.

Once again, whats your reasoning here? I'm not advocating that you lie to the customer, but my internal problems are just that, my internal problems.