>>Huh? So we'll only keep security bugs secret if (or only if?) all other bugs are fully disclosed? I don't see why thats relevant at all.
>I GIVE UP

Seriouslly, I have no clue what you're trying to say sometimes. This is how I read your last post:

>Should there be similar deficiencies in VFP

If there are security bugs in VFP

>then I could go along with keeping mum about

Then they do not have to be fully disclosed

>them provided that all other VFP bugs were full disclosed in a timely manner

As long as all other bugs are.

Sorry if I'm missing something obvious, but I don't see the logic there.