>> But I would like to learn how it is that the VFP Team does not need feedback "to help determine which ERs are most significant to VFP developers". <<

I never said the Fox team doesn't need feedback and ERs, we do. I just said we are pretty far along in completing the design and features of Toledo, so new ERs entered into the WishList database now may not make it into the next vresion (that is not to say it won't, but the not probably). Those ERs would be re-considered in the future of course. All ERs not implemented remain in our ER database for re-review.

Your comments and suggestions about the navigation and discovery of the WishList on the UT should be directed towards the UT, not me or Microsoft. I personally don't find it difficult to enter a new ER or comment on an existing one as it is now, and anyone can do it, even people with free UT accounts.

We do not need a voting system. If people want to do voting like feedback for Toledo features, then the Wiki at http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~VFPToledoWishList~VFP is a good place to do that too.

>> Since the UT is not the sole source for wishes, it would be most helpful to us to have the "official" list available to us somewhere, along with a 'status' indication. I have already mentioned this here to Randy Brown and have not given up hope that something may materialize for this in the future. <<

It is extremely unlikely this will ever happen. People submit ERs in a variety of ways we are going to publish all the ERs it has received. We don't comment on future versions before they are announced, so any kind of status indication would not happen either.