>I seem to be missing something regarding the KB list recently added to the UT.
>
>1) What is the sequence that it naturally is presented to us? I can't see what it is.

Defaults to title in ascending order. Once in it, you can change to whatever field and whatever order you wish.

>2) What good is the date column shown if it doesn't relate to the date of the actual KB article. I couldn't see from the content of the list or any item:

That's the date we added it here. It doesn't relate to the date MS did it.

>3) Finally, the highest numbered article is in the Q111000 range while the actual MS KB lists numbers at over Q300000. What's the story here?

It's because we don't have them all. I have to say I'm pretty proud that we did so much in a few hours.

>Might there be some way to have more meaningful columns in the list heading? For instance, having VFP7 and VFP6 columns should be sufficient foor the headings. Adding the "last reviewed by MS" date would be a useful column. Describing the order of the display would be helpful.

We don't have the MS last reviewed info. If we would have it, we would have to scan all MS entries on a daily basis.

>I think that making the KB available here is a worthy objective, but if we are to remain way behind the actual standing of KB articles that exist then it has a lot less value.

Just give us a chance or maybe a round of applause where we succeeded to come up with so many entries in just one day.