>>>What would be involved to restrict some access to Windows '95?
>>>
>>>For example, on the user workstation, we would like to avoid a user to install a software, to change the registry, etc.
>>
>>
>>Win95 is not a secure OS.
>>
>>What you need is a dumb terminal!
>
>This is excatly what we came to the conclusion the other night. :)
>
>This restriction will probably drop.

BTW i found a shareware named 'SecLOCK' in Zif Davis web site.
It can secure (!) a win95 station.

http://www6.zdnet.com/cgi-bin/texis/swlib/hotfiles/info.html?fcode=000G3T

:o)