>>>>What would be involved to restrict some access to Windows '95?
>>>>
>>>>For example, on the user workstation, we would like to avoid a user to install a software, to change the registry, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>Win95 is not a secure OS.
>>>
>>>What you need is a dumb terminal!
>>
>>This is excatly what we came to the conclusion the other night. :)
>>
>>This restriction will probably drop.
>
>BTW i found a shareware named 'SecLOCK' in Zif Davis web site.
>It can secure (!) a win95 station.
>
>http://www6.zdnet.com/cgi-bin/texis/swlib/hotfiles/info.html?fcode=000G3T

Thanks for the info, I will broadcast that to the security team tomorrow in case they are not aware of it.