Hi Andrus,

It looks like you want to update only records in the Cursor1 that have related records in the Rcursor

SELECT Cursor1
SET RELA TO Field1 INTO RCursor ADDITIVE
* With the record looks
SCAN FOR FOUND("RCursor") 
    REPLACE Field1 WITH RCursor.Field1 
ENDSCAN
* or With the file lock
REPLACE Field1 WITH RCursor.Field1 ;
    FOR FOUND("RCursor")

>>It looks like a bug. However, it still not a good idea to combine set oriented UPDATE-SQL command with record oriented function EOF(). The result could be unpredictable.
>
>If this is not a good idea, how to implement the functionality of this code
>using only good ideas ?
>Unlike access, vfp doesn't allow to use multiple table names after UPDATE
>clause!
>Is it possible to implement such update without SET RELATION ?