Renoir, sorry, I was responding to "As much as I love VFP, it makes me wonder if they should move to some other back-end."

>Claude,
>
>Was this in response to my comment? If so, I must be missing how it directly relates... I was just responding to Russel about his comment that the app can only handle 90 concurrent users. I just wondered if that was really an issue at all.
>
>Renoir
>
>>My impression of the UT is that performance is great even when I've seen it over 100 users. Why go to a more complex setup if you don't have to?
>>>Russel,
>>>
>>>My take wasn't that it's all the cuncurrent users they're able to have, just how many they do have. You may be right though...
>>>
>>>Renoir
>>>
>>>>Well, that is quite interesting, but I wonder about the 90 concurrent users when there are 6000 users registered on it. That means that 1.5% of the users can be on at once. Obviously, in most systems only a percentage of the users are on at once and it could be quite small, like 10 or 15 or 20 percent, but 1.5%? As much as I love VFP, it makes me wonder if they should move to some other back-end.
>>>>
>>>>>>where?
>>>>>>>While looking at the list of World Wide Visual FoxPro applications, I notice a new one today. It has 1185 tables, have 6000 users using it and support up to 90 concurrent users. Well done!
>>>>>
>>>>>In the Visual FoxPro Zone