Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
BINTOC function doesn't sort numeric data correctly
Message
 
 
À
04/12/2001 13:38:18
Cetin Basoz
Engineerica Inc.
Izmir, Turquie
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Divers
Thread ID:
00589393
Message ID:
00589428
Vues:
37
>>Hi everybody,
>>
>>In the compound index I use BINTOC function to convert everything to string. So my index expression will look like:
>>ccode+town+street+bintoc(stNum)+StNumExt... where stNum is Numeric 4. However, we found, that it sorts things incorrectly, e.g. 109 appears before 84. So, does it mean, what this function could not be used or I have some sort of data corruption...?
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>
>Are you sure ? If your stNums <= 0x7FFFFFFF then it'd sort right.
>Cetin

What is 0x7FFFFFFF in decimal? My manager showed me, that 109 was sorted prior to 89. I haven't examined it closely, but it seems, like they were sorted incorrectly. So, does it mean, what BINTOC() doesn't work correctly with numbers or I need to investigate this problem for the particular file?

Here is an index expression: UPPER(STR(galleysort,3)+registry+city+STR(recgrp,1)+street+BINTOC(stnum,2)+stnumext+unit) I see by my own, what 109 preceeds 89.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.


My Blog
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform