>>Quite impressive, Ed. Contratulations! Is that why you've been scarce around here until recently?
>>
>
>Between the mad rush to complete the dissertation, 6 weeks in isolation following an infection, and starting up a new business venture, something had to give. I got pretty disgusted with some of the things going on here for a while, and something had to be given up for a while. The mad rush for begging for points seems to have simmered down; I'm going to be a bit more selective about the topics I get involved with, I think. (I've also stretched the capacities of the user filter almost to its limits...)

I don't know what is the situation with what you mentioned here but we just so you know we have enhanced our documentation a lot since last summer, especially in regards to the Points system which contains a mention about that. Since then, I don't remember the last time someone requested that. When they want it, they just have to force the message to be marked as a solution. Since we implemented that, I haven't heard any other story. I don't think there is that much to say about the current Points structure. I would say it is "Dawn good" if not more, as per all the feedback I keep receiving about it about its satisfaction.

So, you should let that point down as it doesn't apply anymore and that's been the case since the beginning of last summer.

If there are other situations you think are not working as you thing they should be, just let me know. Otherwise, there isn't that much I can do to help in that direction in order to be sure you gain the best of UT. I've seen at several occasions that many users are stating some facts like that where they are misinterpretating them. And, when this is the case, it hurts UT for nothing as it does not relate at all. So, lets try to be careful before stating some stuff like that.