>>I know that I haven't been doing much lately with either the API section, FAQ or files. Speaking of the API section, have you played around with any of the event logging functions under NT/2K?
>>
>
>I might have a class lying around somewhere that talks to the Event Log...I take it I have a guinea pi...erm...beta test volunteer?

If you send it to the office. Don't have Win2K at the house.

>>>>Seriously, I do think that the system has some merit in that it does reward folks in a tangible way that they might not otherwise be able to receive. Of course, that's about it.
>>>>
>>>>OTOH, I've seen a number of solutions rewarded based on a "who was first" rather than who gave the best solution. IMO, however, this isn't a "fixable" situation.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Agreed; I'm not crying "Waaaah, I don't have enuf points < sniffle > < whimper >". I think that people need to distinguish between the need to encourage participation and the need to build a solid base of data on the product and related resources (like the WSH!)
>>
>>Understood from the beginning.< s >
>
>...and here I thought you felt I was only in it for the fringe benefits...

like the CARE packages?:-)

>>>>I certainly hope that no one takes the "standings" as any indicator of technical accuracy. While it may be some indication of a person's abilities, it's no guarantee that the answer given is correct.
>>>
>>>You're kidding, you mean three gold stars doesn't guarentee infallibility? < BEG >
>>
>>If it did Sergey would be Pope!:-)
>
>Do we have to kiss his ring?

LOL!

No, but these days before answering a question we have to pray that he hasn't answered already.< bg >