>Sure, it counts, but again it's no assurance of technical accuracy. However, I think that over the long term, a bad solution may cause more problems than the original question was meant to solve. Caveat emptor. Let the buyer beware. You get what you pay for. No warrenties intended or implied.< g >

To clarify on that one, it's not permanently frozen. By that, I mean that if we discover that a message shouldn't have been marked as a solution of the thread because it doesn't relate to that, we will readjust. We already readjusted some situations like these before. So, when being discovered or when someone else reports something like that to us, we will act accordingly.