>>>>>Stop bullshitting yourself.
>>>>Ed, speak and act like a real doctorate degree holder. Or use your Christian Spirit and conscience if you're one.
>>>
>>>Mr Banaga, the use of straightforward venacular to address reality, even the occasional use of an epithet, is not unwarranted in this situation.
>>
>>Ed,
>>No matter how you explain it, the word you used is still unaccepted in a Christian community and other religion who practices the doctrice they embrace. Anyways, the way you handle arguments and technical debates reflects your attitude. Tsk, tsk, tsk...
>>
>>>And I ain't a Christian.
>>It's not surprising to me.
>
>Jess,
>I would have thought you have been a member of this forum long enough to know that Ed worships nobody but himself.
>
>Being awarded a doctorate will only serve to enhance his own overinflated idea of himself.
>
>His lack of wit, & inability to express himself cogently, has regularly shown itself in the form of language that is unacceptable to the majority of people.
>
>Shortly after joining UT, I received the following in a private post, from another UT member, which, like his replies to many VFP questions, it is very accurate. :
>
>"You will find that the inimitable Ed Rauh is the most sarcastic (always negatively overtoned) and descriptive (often with violent/bloody/carnal imagery) of the bunch. Also the person who requested the "twit filter" and who promotes it most. Funny, but if the tone here was respectful and a tad more thorough, a "twit" filter wouldn't be required. And the real twits (of which I number Mr. Rauh as number 1) would summarily be out of here by management decree."

Len,

You and I have had our issues - and agreements - here, but to what purpose did you post that? Sure Ed has an ego, and even though I'm not always in-tune with his presentation, I almost always respect the information and solutions he posts. And you of all people should be aware of how flaming messages serve no purpose. Expecially those fanning the flames.

Renoir