>>And the fact that you have issues with Ed's wit is your problem. Don't try to make it someone elses also.
>>
>>Sorry bud. But if you disappeared from here tomorrow, I don't think there would be a hoot at all from the crowd. But when Ed was gone for a while, this summer, he was greatly missed.
>>
>
>I appreciate where you're coming from Perry, but I don't advocate tossing anyone out on their butts, no matter how much I may disagree with them. That's what twit filters are for. For the people who would rather do without someone's posts, if it adds value to the UT, get a PUTM and just add them that offends to the twit list, and, *poof* they're gone. It cuts down on the required dosage of antistress medication neeeded to participate in the forum, and may significantly decrease the message volume, at the discression of the person setting the filter.
>
>I don't publish my twit list, I just ignore the existance of the twits.
>
>IOW, for those that are disturbed by me, if you'd rather I wasn't here, pop for a PUTM, and you've got UT less Ed's posts. A small price to pay for peace of mind.
>
>...although I am bothered by the complaints of lack of wit and cogency; I do try to be entertaining if nothing else!

Ed,
Just as long as you don't add me to the filter!!! You've saved my _ss too many times with the resolution to my problem!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tracy
:0)