>>Hehe. When I was typing the reply I was thinking, "hmmm, I've never used the :: before, I wonder why"? Guess my brain got stuck. Thanks.
>>
>
>Yours was an improvement on what I was going to post.

Thanks.

>I guess it depends on if more is to be done in Test2::showString() as to which way to go, though.

Yeah, I guessed it was just to fix the base functionality.

>
>

>Define Test1 as Test
>  function showString(aString)
>    dodefault(aString)
>  endfunc
>  function fixFunc(aString)
>    Test1::showString( 'String: ' + aString )
>  endfunc
>Enddefine
>
>Define Test2 as Test1
>  function showString(aString)
>    this.fixFunc(aString)
>  endfunc
>Enddefine
>