>>'Since there seem to be a lot of people converting to CodeMine from Codebook based frameworks these days, we've added this sample to make it easier for you to duplicate that interface style.'
>
>Have you looked at the date of that comment. It is way back 98/99'ish. It has squat to do with Codemine 7. Is is constructed in Codemine 6.
>
>>Is this a shot at Mere Mortals?
>
>No. It says "Codebook". I don't think that the MM folk would say that MM is Codebook. It may have started out based on Codebook but is a way different product nowadays. The main issue is that the sample merely shows a pageframe approach with a grid on one page and controls on the other - just like the original Codebook approach.
>
>>it'll be interesting to see how the latest claim is dealt with...
>
>What latest claim?
>
>>it's bare knuckle time...
>
>What, over a framework? Do you get road rage too <s>.
nah .. i just got a bit of a laugh out of the way the following claim
'Unfortunately, using these methods in VFP 6.0 adds 40 to 50 percent to the object load time overhead . This in turn leads to slower loading forms, and an overall sluggish feel to your applications. This overhead is not acceptable to us, so we have developed alternative techniques that run much faster.'
was fiercely debated in
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~CodeMine~VFPi like codemine and its speed...
i am able to build apps and not tell clients to buy new hardware...
their stuff can run on p2-200's without a problem...
