Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Is that true ?
Message
From
19/12/2001 14:41:47
 
 
To
19/12/2001 14:34:57
Jason Dalio
Northern Interior Regional Health Board
Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
General information
Forum:
Windows
Category:
Other
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00596293
Message ID:
00596371
Views:
21
Jason,

There were certain chipsets that would not cache more than 64MB RAM. I believe it was the VX chipset. So a Win95 machine with those motherboards would be slower if it had more than 64MB.

>There was an old rumor a long time ago that Windows 95 did not utilize more then 64MB of ram. In a small way it was true but not the way people thought it. I can't rememebr enough about the details to quote it but is hat what you are possibly thinkg about Claudia?
Steve Gibson
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform