>George,
>Did I mention that this was copied from a posting on new2news? I don't actually understand in any detail this code. I hope this is the part that you are interested in (thanks):

Calvin,

Yes, you did mention it, however, yesterday I didn't have the opportunity to look at the code, and to-day, unfortunately the page can't be found.

I asked Ed to take a look, and I'd take what he had to say over my own advice anytime. Frankly, I know of no one more qualified in the Fox community in this area than Ed, and he's the guy that I go to when I have a question.

If you'd like, email me the entire code. Unlike Ed, I'm not going to be terribly busy over the holidays (I'm off after tomorrow until Jan. 2), except for the usual pre-Christmas stuff I've got to do. While I have reserved a significant portion of my time for other pursuits (like drinking beer and watching football< bg >), I'll try to take a look and implement the changes that Ed recommends. Please be aware, however, that I'm not promising anything more than an attempt at a solution.

I say this principally because of two problems. First, while I have a dot matrix to test on at home, I don't have a Win 2K or XP box to test on. While I have a Win2K box here at the office, I don't have access to a dot matrix printer.

Your best bet may be to contact the original author, if known, of the code and advise him of the problem and what Ed had to say.