>>We need to continue to battle this FUD as I did trying to explain to him browser headers.
>
>So what are the real numbers?

I think the real point is that the numbers don't matter a pinch. Everything has to start somewhere, even the most wildly popular stuff ever. When it starts it's at zero.

The only purpose to bandy a number like this about is pure unadulterated FUD. It serves no other purpose than to disparage the product named and spread uncertainty in the minds of those who may already be aboard the product.

Like I said, Windows was once at .24%. Should everyone have run from the product? Should its builders run off crying in despair?