Mike,

>>Perhaps you have a vested interest in their positions...
>
>Dunno, and I really don't care. I'm just pointing out that you slant terms in your favor, often.

Of course I "slant" the terms. However, two things. So do you and so does just about everyone else.

Secondly, I dare say that my 'slant' is far closer to reality. Until you can prove my position to be untrue (and I'd be delighted to be corrected as I do want honesty from all - especially myself) all you are doing is making gratuitous assertions and calling them fact.

As I've stated many times, if you are interested I'll be delighted to provide as many references above and beyond all I already have. As I have had no indication that you've investigated the ones I've already offered I'll wait until you ask. But.. If you have not investigated them I dare say that you are willfully choosing to limit your information and that doesn't strike me as healthy nor does it give you justification for asserting that my position is incorrect.

Like I said, perhaps you have a vested interest in not learning something that would cause you to have to rethink things.. Perhaps not.