We've discussed this previously. I won't comment any further on it with you.

>
>The part of the quote that I want to clarify is bolded (by me).
>
>It certainly NEVER came across to me as "requests from the VFP community" and to me this amounts to FUD!
>
>In fact, to this outsider it looked like the VFP Team had pretty well made up it's mind that VFP was NOT to be included with VS.NET and then they set out on a campaign, asking (the community) a loaded question for opinions, and then made the announcement.
>
>Calling it "requests from the VFP community" is such a stretch in my opinion that I had to comment.
>
>Jim
>
>SNIP