Definately the decision to remove VFP from VS should be in there. However, the marketing issue is one of perception and should not be in the history. The fact is, VFP6 was being marketed. Could more have been done? Probably, but it was going on.


>Hi fellows,
>
>After replying to Jim Nelson's message (Title: Re: Microsoft.public.vsnet.vfp.general Thread #598060 Message #598230) I wondered if the two events listed below, are part of the History of FoxPro and should be included in its web pages.
>
>I ask you, please, to help reasoning if you think they should or should not be included (are they part of the history?), because they deal with some of FoxPro's crossroads. Besides being very controversial (as I can see they still are) there were many people discussing each subject at that time (both are posted in Fox.Wikis and have many related pages linked to each one):
>
>ShouldVFPBeInVSDotNet: http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~ShouldVFPBeInVSDotNet~VFP
>
>WillMicrosoftMarketVFP: http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~WillMicrosoftMarketVFP
>
>Thanks,
>
>Fernando