>>Since my name, and the tool I wrote are being mentioned, I hope you don't mind my jumping in.
>
>You are always welcome George:)

Thank you, Mark.

>In fact I wish more folks would jump into threads. Reticence about these things is supposed only something us Brits have:)

Hey, I'm English/Irish/Scots/Welsh, so I come by it honestly.:-)

>I tend to avoid asking the authors of tools directly to try and share the support burden out and just hope they might spot it<g>.

I have no objection to you're putting out a post here either directly to me or to other folks who have used the tool. I don't claim to have all the answers, and if someone else who has tried to do something like what you're doing pipes in with a solution, so much the better.

>Yes the idea of doing this in the background, or even in a minimised window seems slim:(

This is something probably best suited for C++. Believe me, it would've been a lot easier to write it in that envirnoment rather than Fox. I did, however, what to show what could be done within the Fox envirnoment in this regard.

>I am starting to cool on the idea a bit because it looks like a lot of work trying to do it.

In Fox, yes. I something like C++, perhaps not so difficult. I really, however, haven't investigated close enough to say for sure.

>One area that may help but I have not been able to chase up, is the Report to Web article in Fox Talk. I dont have a subscription to that mag.

I wish I could help here, but I don't either.

>BTW your tool is ideal for some other stuff I am doing, Thanks!
>
Glad to hear it. Use it in good health.< s >